Legal Opinion
State v. Bailey
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided August 28, 1996No. 94CR1611 and 94CR1957 CA A87139 Control and CA A88034PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHaselton, J.
Defendant appeals his conviction for possession of a controlled substance, ORS 475.992, and assigns error to the denial of his motion to suppress evidence. We vacate the conviction and remand for further findings pertaining to the lawfulness of the search.
The facts, as found by the trial court, are as follows: On the night of September 11, 1994, Myrtle Point Reserve Police Officer Gwartney saw defendant looking in the windows and trying the door handles of a business establishment. Gwartney contacted Walker, another officer, and reported his observations.
Walker responded and saw defendant…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Ball v. GladdenOregon Supreme Court · 1968
- State v. HolmesOregon Supreme Court · 1991
- Hampton Tree Farms, Inc. v. JewettOregon Supreme Court · 1995
- State v. Dominguez-MartinezOregon Supreme Court · 1995
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- State v. HadleyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997
- State v. WoodallCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
- State v. BushCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
- Cruz v. Multnomah CountyMultnomah County Circuit Court, Oregon · 2016
- State v. AlcarazCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2022
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.