Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

In Re Rast

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided December 6, 1999No. 25027PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

In this attorney grievance matter, William J. Rast Jr., Esquire, (“Attorney”) is charged with engaging in misconduct in violation of various provisions of the Rules of Professional Conduct contained in Rule 407, SCACR, and the Rules for Lawyer Disciplinary Enforcement contained in Rule 413, SCACR.

Factual/Procedural Background

On September 23, 1998, the Commission on Lawyer Conduct (the “Commission”) served Attorney with a notice and complaint alleging: (1) Attorney failed to timely prepare a court order for a client representing a settlement agreement in a domestic case; (2) Attorney failed to…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. In the Matter of TreacySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1982
  2. Matter of KirvenSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1976
  3. Matter of MooreSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1997
  4. In the Matter of AckerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1992
  5. Matter of DobsonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1993

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In Re LongSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2001
  2. In Re PurvisSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2001
  3. In Re RastSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2004
  4. In re BerrySupreme Court of South Carolina · 2001
  5. In re ChastainSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API