Legal Opinion

In Re Rast

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided July 26, 2004No. 25845PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

This attorney disciplinary matter involves Respondent’s failure to draft an order and his failure to respond to Disciplinary Counsel. We agree with the subpanel’s recommendation and issue a public reprimand.

PROCEDURAL HISTORY

Respondent was served with Formal Charges on September 20, 2002. Respondent filed an Answer on October 21, 2002. A hearing was held before the subpanel on August 6, 2003. No exceptions were filed and the full panel adopted the report of the subpanel on January 21, 2004. The subpanel made the following findings and recommendations:

I. Failure to Timely Prepare a Family…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. In the Matter of TreacySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1982
  2. In Re LarkinSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1999
  3. In Re LongSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2001
  4. In Re RastSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1999
  5. In re Yon RastSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1990

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In re AtwaterSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API