Legal Opinion

In the Matter of Acker

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided May 11, 1992No. 23657PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DEFINITE SUSPENSION

2Per curiam

In this attorney discipline matter, respondent has been charged with neglecting legal matters entrusted to him in violation of DR6-101(A)(3), 1 unilaterally terminating representation of a client’s case on appeal in violation of Supreme Court Rule 3(1)(A), and failing to cooperate with the Board’s investigation of this matter in violation of DR1102(A)(4). 2 The Panel recommended indefinite suspension. The Executive Committee adopted the Panel’s findings of facts and conclusions of law but made an independent recommendation of disbarment. We agree with the Panel and…

3Cases cited12 opinions

  1. In Re BloomSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1975
  2. In the Matter of AlexanderSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1990
  3. In the Matter of BrunerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1984
  4. In the Matter of PalmerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1989
  5. In the Matter of FousheeSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1988

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by10 opinions

  1. Matter of MooreSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1997
  2. In Re McFarlandSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2004
  3. In Re RastSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1999
  4. Matter of HollerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1998
  5. In Re DaySupreme Court of South Carolina · 2002

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API