Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

In Re Purvis

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided December 10, 2001No. 25388PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

In this attorney disciplinary matter, the sub-panel and the full panel recommended respondent Olin L. Purvis, III, be disbarred. We agree and disbar respondent.

FACTS

The Commission on Lawyer Conduct filed formal charges against respondent regarding numerous matters. Respondent was placed on interim suspension on January 6, 2000. In re Purvis, 338 S.C. 113, 526 S.E.2d 512 (2000). Respondent did not answer the formal charges, was found in default by the sub-panel, and did not appear at the hearing.

Matter 1

Respondent represented Ann Dunham, a purchaser in a real estate transaction. Respondent…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. In Re YarboroughSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1999
  2. Matter of ThorntonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1997
  3. In Re DriggersSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1999
  4. In Re RastSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1999
  5. In Re GodboldSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1999

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In Re ChandlerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2003
  2. In re ChastainSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2003
  3. In re SmithSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API