Legal Opinion

Keeling v. Schastey & Vollmer

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 26, 1912No. Civ. No. 903PublishedCited by 6 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco, and from an order denying a new trial. James M. Troutt, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtKerrigan, J.

This is an appeal by the defendant from a final judgment in favor of the plaintiff, taken within sixty days after entry, and from an order denying defendant’s motion for a new trial, in an action in quantum meruit for labor performed and materials furnished.

Briefly, the facts are that in the month of June, 1907, the defendant entered into a contract with the Cliff House Company, a corporation, to alter and repair an existing building known as the Cliff House. Subsequently the defendant made a contract with A. C. Wocker, plaintiff’s assignor, whereby certain painting and plastering work in and…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Butterfield v. ByronMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1891
  2. Carlson v. SheehanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
  3. Cleary v. SohierMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1876
  4. Hollis v. ChapmanTexas Supreme Court · 1872
  5. Niblo v. BinsseNew York Court of Appeals · 1864

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Gray v. BekinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
  2. Jogani v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
  3. H. Hackfeld Co., Ltd. v. CastleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
  4. Kennedy v. ReeceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
  5. Robb v. PartenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1928

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API