H. Hackfeld Co., Ltd. v. Castle
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. Andros & Hengstler and Louis T. Hengstler for Appellant. Walter Perry Johnson and Nathan H. Frank for Respondents.
1Opinion of the CourtOlnet, J.
The plaintiff, an exporting firm of the Hawaiian Islands, sold to the defendants, a jobbing firm of San Francisco, the output of honey of a certain Hawaiian brand, for t'he season of 1914. The output amounted to 1,946 cases, of which eight hundred were delivered and paid for. The defendants refused to accept the remaining 1,146 cases, and the plaintiff sold them at puiblic auction for the account of the defendants for a figure less than the contract price, and .brought the present action for the difference. Judgment went against the .plaintiff, and it appeals.
At the time the contract of sale…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Stewart v. . StoneNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
- The TornadoSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
- Furness, Withy & Co. v. RandallCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1914
- Clarksville Land Co. v. HarrimanSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1895
- Ellis v. Atlantic Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Johnson v. AtkinsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
- Baetjer v. New England Alcohol Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1946
- United States Trading Corp. v. Newmark Grain Co.California Court of Appeal · 1922
- La Cumbre Golf & Country Club v. Santa Barbara Hotel Co.California Supreme Court · 1928
- CACHIL DEHE BAND OF WINTUN INDIANS v. CaliforniaDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2009
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.