Hollis v. Chapman
Texas Supreme Court
Appeal from Galveston. Tried below before the Hon. George E. Scott. The facts are indicated in the opinion and the head-notes.
1Opinion of the CourtOgden, J.
Under our blended system of legal jurisprudence, and especially under our peculiar system of pleading, common counts in declarations, as technically known at common law, have never been considered as necessary or essential. But, while most of the fictions, and many of the -forms, recognized and prescribed in the books, have in this State been abolished, yet the substance of every count and form is as requisite under our practice as under any other system; every action being a special action on the particular case, the petition should set forth “ a “ full and clear statement of the cause of…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Carroll v. WelchTexas Supreme Court · 1861
- Gonzales College v. McHughTexas Supreme Court · 1858
- Hillyard v. Crabtree's Adm'rTexas Supreme Court · 1854
- Keyes v. StoneMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1809
3Cited by19 opinions
- Dolan v. . RodgersNew York Court of Appeals · 1896
- Butterfield v. ByronMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1891
- Cook v. McCabeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1881
- Duncan v. BakerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1878
- Weis v. DevlinTexas Supreme Court · 1887
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.