Legal Opinion

Flournoy v. State of California

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 25, 1969No. Civ. 11981PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFriedman, Acting P. J.

Plaintiffs seek damages for the wrongful death of Cherre Flournoy, who was killed in a highway accident in November 1955. They charge the state with maintaining a highway bridge in a dangerous condition. Lapse of time is partially attributable to the 1961 legislation which suspended the prosecution of negligence actions against California public agencies pending consideration of new legislation governing public tort liability. In 1963 such legislation was enacted. (Gov. Code, § 814 et seq.)

On a prior appeal in this case we held that the new legislation governed the present lawsuit and ordered…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Stewart v. CoxCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Taylor v. Oakland Scavenger Co.California Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Fackrell v. City of San DiegoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
  4. Crogan v. MetzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  5. Flournoy v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. PartridgeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Garvey v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.California Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Cameron v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  4. Mozzetti v. City of BrisbaneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
  5. De La Rosa v. City of San BernardinoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API