Legal Opinion

De La Rosa v. City of San Bernardino

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 16, 1971No. Civ. 10039PublishedCited by 42 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

TAMURA, J.

This is a personal injury action against the City of San Bernardino (City) for injuries allegedly sustained by plaintiffs in a two-car intersection collision. Plaintiffs sued the City on the theory that the .accident was proximately caused by a hazardous condition existing at the intersection. After both sides rested the court granted a defense motion for a directed verdict. Plaintiffs appeal from the judgment entered on the directed verdict.

On this appeal defendant’s principal argument in support of the directed verdict is that plaintiffs’ proof failed, as a matter of law,…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Gray v. BrinkerhoffCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
  2. Taylor v. Centennial Bowl, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1966
  3. Teall v. City of CudahyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
  4. Hilts v. County of SolanoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
  5. Dudum v. City of San MateoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by42 opinions

  1. Carson v. Facilities Development Co.California Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Ducey v. Argo Sales Co.California Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Mozzetti v. City of BrisbaneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
  4. Bonanno v. Central Contra Costa Transit AuthorityCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
  5. McMahan's of Santa Monica v. City of Santa MonicaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API