De La Rosa v. City of San Bernardino
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
TAMURA, J.
This is a personal injury action against the City of San Bernardino (City) for injuries allegedly sustained by plaintiffs in a two-car intersection collision. Plaintiffs sued the City on the theory that the .accident was proximately caused by a hazardous condition existing at the intersection. After both sides rested the court granted a defense motion for a directed verdict. Plaintiffs appeal from the judgment entered on the directed verdict.
On this appeal defendant’s principal argument in support of the directed verdict is that plaintiffs’ proof failed, as a matter of law,…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Gray v. BrinkerhoffCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
- Taylor v. Centennial Bowl, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1966
- Teall v. City of CudahyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
- Hilts v. County of SolanoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
- Dudum v. City of San MateoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by42 opinions
- Carson v. Facilities Development Co.California Supreme Court · 1984
- Ducey v. Argo Sales Co.California Supreme Court · 1979
- Mozzetti v. City of BrisbaneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
- Bonanno v. Central Contra Costa Transit AuthorityCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
- McMahan's of Santa Monica v. City of Santa MonicaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.