Meek v. Meek
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
SCHOTTKY, J. pro tem.
This is an appeal from an order denying appellant’s petition for a modification of a final decree of divorce.
In May, 1934, respondent was granted an interlocutory decree of divorce from appellant and it was ordered that appellant pay to respondent for the support and maintenance of respondent and the three minor children of the parties the sum of $100 per month, and it was further ordered that “the property settlement heretofore entered into being between the parties hereto be, and the same is hereby, approved and made a part of this decree.” The same provisions were…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Miller v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
- Sears Ettlinger v. EttlingerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
- H. A. Keach v. Roberta KeachCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1927
- Parks v. ParksCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1925
- Armstrong v. ArmstrongCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Anderson v. MartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
- Codorniz v. CodornizCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
- Carter v. CarterSupreme Court of Virginia · 1975
- Streeter v. StreeterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
- Zalka v. ZalkaSupreme Court of Florida · 1958
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.