Legal Opinion

Armstrong v. Armstrong

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 16, 1933No. Docket No. 9020PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNourse, P. J.

This appeal involves the simple issue whether an award of alimony made in harmony with a property settlement agreement may be modified upon a proper showing.

The complaint pleaded an action for divorce upon the ground of the husband’s desertion. It alleged that, for the purpose of settling their property fights, and for making provisions for the support of their minor child, the parties had entered into a written agreement. This agreement was attached as an exhibit and incorporated in the complaint. The defendant permitted his default to be entered. The trial court found the allegations of the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Johnson v. JohnsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
  2. Parker v. ParkerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
  3. Hughes v. HughesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Hough v. HoughCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
  2. Puckett v. PuckettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Miller v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
  4. Sears Ettlinger v. EttlingerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
  5. Gillespie v. GillespieArizona Supreme Court · 1952

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API