Legal Opinion

Anderson v. Mart

California Supreme Court

Decided November 16, 1956No. S. F. 19535PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTraynor, J.

On March 12, 1948, plaintiff Dorothy A. Anderson and decedent William E. Anderson executed a property settlement agreement. On June 22, 1948, plaintiff filed an action against decedent for divorce. In her complaint she alleged jurisdictional facts, extreme cruelty, her fitness for child custody, and that she “does not have sufficient money, means or property with which to support and maintain herself and the minor child of the parties hereto, and that the sum of $60.00 per month is a reasonable and necessary sum to be allowed said plaintiff as and for the support and maintenance of said…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Puckett v. PuckettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Burtnett v. KingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
  3. Pacific Mutual Life Insurance v. McConnellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  4. Messenger v. MessengerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  5. Miller v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Becker v. S.P v. Construction Co.California Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Plumer v. PlumerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
  3. DuValle v. DuValleCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1977
  4. Wyoming Pacific Oil Co. v. PrestonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
  5. Zalka v. ZalkaSupreme Court of Florida · 1958

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API