Legal Opinion

Eberdt v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided October 30, 1978No. A76-11 16621, CA 10157PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLee, J.

Plaintiff, a doctor, appeals from a summary judgment entered in favor of defendant, his professional liability insurance carrier. Plaintiff contends that the insurer was obligated by the terms of an insurance policy to defend against an action for alienation of affections and that, therefore, the insurer is liable for the cost of settling the action filed against plaintiff by a third party

From 1971 to 1974, plaintiff had a professional liability insurance policy with defendant. In March, 1975, plaintiff was served with summons and complaint in a suit entitled "DANIEL THOMAS HANNAN V. EDWARD…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Isenhart v. General Casualty Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Nielsen v. St. Paul CompaniesOregon Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Blohm v. Glens Falls InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1962
  4. Snyder v. NelsonOregon Supreme Court · 1977
  5. Rogue River Management Co. v. ShawOregon Supreme Court · 1966

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. BarrettCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2000
  2. Rivera v. Nevada Medical Liability InsuranceNevada Supreme Court · 1991
  3. USAA Property & Casualty Insurance v. RowlandCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1993
  4. Smith v. St. Paul Guardian InsuranceDistrict Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1985
  5. Rivera v. Nevada Medical Liability InsuranceNevada Supreme Court · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API