Eberdt v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtLee, J.
Plaintiff, a doctor, appeals from a summary judgment entered in favor of defendant, his professional liability insurance carrier. Plaintiff contends that the insurer was obligated by the terms of an insurance policy to defend against an action for alienation of affections and that, therefore, the insurer is liable for the cost of settling the action filed against plaintiff by a third party
From 1971 to 1974, plaintiff had a professional liability insurance policy with defendant. In March, 1975, plaintiff was served with summons and complaint in a suit entitled "DANIEL THOMAS HANNAN V. EDWARD…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Isenhart v. General Casualty Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1962
- Nielsen v. St. Paul CompaniesOregon Supreme Court · 1978
- Blohm v. Glens Falls InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1962
- Snyder v. NelsonOregon Supreme Court · 1977
- Rogue River Management Co. v. ShawOregon Supreme Court · 1966
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. BarrettCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2000
- Rivera v. Nevada Medical Liability InsuranceNevada Supreme Court · 1991
- USAA Property & Casualty Insurance v. RowlandCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1993
- Smith v. St. Paul Guardian InsuranceDistrict Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1985
- Rivera v. Nevada Medical Liability InsuranceNevada Supreme Court · 1991