Legal Opinion
USAA Property & Casualty Insurance v. Rowland
Court of Appeals of South Carolina
Decided September 20, 1993No. 2074PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Goolsby, Judge:
USAA Property and Casualty Insurance Company brought this action for a declaratory judgment against Donald M. Rowland and James R. Carter to determine whether a standard homeowner’s policy issued by USAA to Rowland required USAA to defend Rowland in an alienation of affections action brought by Carter against Rowland. The trial court declared USAA had a duty to defend Rowland in the action. USAA appeals. We reverse.
FACTS
In his action for alienation of affections, Carter’s amended complaint alleges he suffered “bodily injury” because Rowland “wrongfully, intentionally,…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Snakenberg v. Hartford Casualty Ins. Co., Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1989
- O'NEIL v. SchuckardtIdaho Supreme Court · 1986
- Blaylock v. StreckerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1987
- McNelis v. BruceArizona Supreme Court · 1961
- Tice v. MandelNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1956
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Isle of Palms Pest Control Co. v. Monticello InsuranceCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1994
- Northern Security Insurance v. PerronSupreme Court of Vermont · 2001
- State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. BarrettCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2000
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. MoorerCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1998
- Sunex International, Inc. v. Travelers Indemnity Co.District Court, D. South Carolina · 2001
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.