Legal Opinion

Rogue River Management Co. v. Shaw

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided February 24, 1966PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SCHWAB, J. (Pro Tempore).

Plaintiff brought an action seeking to recover the price of concrete aggregate sold and delivered to the defendant. Defendant’s answer contained an affirma tive pleading which the trial judge submitted to the jury as a claim for recoupment. On the issue of right of recoupment the jury found for the defendant in the full amount submitted to the jury and reduced the amount of judgment for the plaintiff accordingly. Plaintiff contends that it was error to submit “recoupment” to the jury because this defense was not within the issues framed by the pleadings.

The defendant…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Noonan v. City of PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1938
  2. Oregon v. Portland Gen. Elec. Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1908
  3. Krausse v. GreenfieldOregon Supreme Court · 1912
  4. McCargar v. WileyOregon Supreme Court · 1924
  5. Wells v. ApplegateOregon Supreme Court · 1885

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Sabin v. Willamette-Western CorporationOregon Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Community Bank v. EllOregon Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Wilkes v. ZurlindenOregon Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Oregon Bank v. Nautilus Crane & Equipment Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1984
  5. Lukens v. GoitWyoming Supreme Court · 1967

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API