Legal Opinion

Blohm v. Glens Falls Insurance

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided July 6, 1962PublishedCited by 47 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPerry, J.

The plaintiffs brought this action against the defendant Glens Falls Insurance Company to recover the expenses they had incurred in defending a personal injury action. The action against these plaintiffs, which they successfully defended, was instituted by one Edward Jarvi.

At the time Jarvi commenced his action against these plaintiffs the plaintiffs tendered the defense of the action to the defendant insurance company on the theory that the incident alleged in Jarvi’s complaint was indemnified under the policy issued plaintiffs by defendant. The insurance company refused the tender to defend…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Huset v. J. I. Case Threshing Mach. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1903
  2. MacDonald v. United Pacific InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1957
  3. JARVIS ET UX v. Indemnity Ins. Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1961
  4. Lewis v. MerrillOregon Supreme Court · 1961

3Cited by47 opinions

  1. Ledford v. GutoskiOregon Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Central Bearings Co. v. Wolverine Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Iowa · 1970
  3. Isenhart v. General Casualty Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1962
  4. Nielsen v. St. Paul CompaniesOregon Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Anderson v. Klix Chemical Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1970

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API