Casserly v. City of Oakland
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
The question involved in each of these three cases is, to all intents and purposes, the same. In the first ease, the plaintiff, Nora Casserly, who is the widow of William Casserly, a member for several years prior to his death on December 12, 1930, of the Oakland fire department, filed her petition in the superior court for a peremptory writ of mandamus against the respondents, compelling them to pay her the full amount of pension allowed to her August 9, 1932, without reduction therefrom by reason of the ordinance hereafter to be mentioned. At the time of William Casserly’s death,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- O'Dea v. CookCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
- Klench v. Board of Pension Fund CommissionersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926
- Aitken v. RocheCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
- Whitehead v. DavieCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
- Rumetsch v. DavieCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- Kern v. City of Long BeachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
- Abbott v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
- City of Dallas v. TrammellTexas Supreme Court · 1937
- Allen v. City of Long BeachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
- Butterworth v. BoydCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.