Rumetsch v. Davie
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Alameda County. A. P. St. Sure, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtBrittain, J.
The defendants appeal from a judgment awarding the plaintiff a peremptory writ of mandate in effect directing them to approve his claim as a retired corporal of police in the city of Oakland for one-half the amount of salary attached to the rank he had held for one year prior to his retirement. The facts are admitted, and the only question to be determined is whether the respondent is entitled to pension computed on a basis of the salary he was receiving at the date of retirement or that which he was receiving one year, prior to retirement.
The charter of the city of Oakland was adopted in…
2Cited by14 opinions
- Klench v. Board of Pension Fund CommissionersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926
- Terry v. City of BerkeleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
- Sweesy v. Los Angeles County Peace Officers' Retirement BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Casserly v. City of OaklandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
- People v. FloresCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.