Legal Opinion
Grade-Way Construction v. United States
United States Court of Claims
Decided January 16, 1985No. 1-85CPublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*265OPINION
YANNELLO, Judge.
Plaintiff is the second lowest bidder and intervenor the lowest bidder. Plaintiff protests any award to intervenor on the grounds that its bid is not responsive to the solicitation as amended.
In a stipulation filed on January 9, 1985, the parties agreed to many of the facts in this case. They need not be restated in detail here. However, in view of the rather interesting turn this case has taken, it is well to begin this opinion with a brief statement of some of the general principles of the law of government contracts as they apply to contract award.
It is an obvious…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- G. L. Christian and Associates v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1963
- G. L. Christian and Associates v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1963
- Bushman Construction Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1958
3Cited by7 opinions
- M.W. Kellogg Co./Siciliana Appalti Costruzioni, S.p.A. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1986
- K-Con, Inc. v. Secretary of the ArmyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2018
- Honeywell, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1989
- Orion International Technologies v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005
- Integrated Business Solutions, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2003
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.