Legal Opinion
Orion International Technologies v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided June 30, 2005No. 04-250CPublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*570 OPINION AND ORDER
WOLSKI, Judge.
This post-award bid protest concerns the ability of a non-incumbent bidder to include in its proposal the name of an employee of the incumbent for a key position. The incumbent, Orion International Technologies (“Orion”), the plaintiff here, required its employees to sign no-eompete agreements, pledging not to offer assistance to other bidders. One employee had already discussed the prospect of a position with another bidder, Fiore Industries, Inc. (“Fiore”), which ultimately was awarded the contract and has intervened in this matter. Before the no-compete…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Alfa Laval Separation, Inc. v. United States, and Westfalia Separators, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1999
- Orion International Technologies v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2004
- Aerolease Long Beach v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1994
- Labat-Anderson, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1999
- Planning Research Corporation v. The United States, and Electronic Data Systems Federal Corporation, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1992
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Tech Systems, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
- CBY Design Builders v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012
- Red River Holdings, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009
- Emerald Coast Finest Produce Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007
- Protection Strategies, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.