Legal Opinion
K-Con, Inc. v. Secretary of the Army
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided November 5, 2018No. 2017-2254PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Stoll, Circuit Judge.
K-Con, Inc. and the Army entered into two contracts for pre-engineered metal buildings. The Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals ("Board") held that bonding requirements were included in the contracts by operation of law at the time they were awarded, pursuant to the Christian doctrine. See G. L. Christian & Assocs. v. United States ( Christian I ), 312 F.2d 418 (Ct. Cl. 1963). K-Con appeals. We conclude that the two contracts are construction contracts and that, under the Christian doctrine, the standard bond requirements in construction contracts were incorporated…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- F. D. Rich Co. v. United States Ex Rel. Industrial Lumber Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Kingdomware Technologies, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
- Grumman Data Systems Corporation v. John H. Dalton, Secretary of the Navy, and Intergraph Corporation, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
- Community Heating & Plumbing Company, Inc. v. Admiral Frank B. Kelso, Ii, Acting Secretary of the NavyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1993
- G. L. Christian and Associates v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1963
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Inserso Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2020
- The Boeing Company v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2020
- Gadsden Industrial Park, LLC v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2020
- Blue Tech Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2021
- Boeing Company v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2019
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.