Legal Opinion
Integrated Business Solutions, Inc. v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided November 6, 2003No. 03-2222-CPublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WILLIAMS, Judge.
This pre-award protest presents the issue of whether an agency must consider an offer- or’s initial proposal when the offeror’s final proposal revision (FPR) has been properly rejected as late. Plaintiff, Integrated Business Solutions, Inc. (IBS), although conceding that its FPR was late, nevertheless challenges the National Science Foundation’s (NSF) refusal to consider its initial proposal which it claims was still a viable pending offer. This matter comes before the Court on Plaintiffs Motion for Summary Judgment pursuant to RCFC 56 and Defendant’s Motion for…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Information Technology & Applications Corporation v. United States, and Rs Information Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2003
- Honeywell, Inc. v. The United States v. Haz-Tad, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1989
- Alfa Laval Separation, Inc. v. United States, and Westfalia Separators, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1999
- Statistica, Inc. v. Warren G. Christopher, Secretary of State, and the Orkand Corporation, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
- Information Technology & Applications Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2001
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Gentex Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2003
- PHT Supply Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006
- Metropolitan Van & Storage, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010
- International Resource Recovery, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2004
- Comprehensive Health Services, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.