Legal Opinion
Honeywell, Inc. v. United States
United States Court of Claims
Decided January 13, 1989No. 698-88CPublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FUTEY, Judge.
This pre-award contract action is before the court on plaintiff’s motion to enjoin the Department of the Army from awarding a contract to Haz-Tad, Inc. to produce and deliver Digital Group Multiplexers and related hardware. The contracting officer found Haz-Tad, Inc.’s bid ambiguous as to the bidder’s identity and therefore non-responsive. However, on protest to the Government Accounting Office, a recommendation was issued which concluded that the bid was responsive. The Army thereafter adopted the General Accounting Office’s recommendation. Plaintiff asserts, inter alia,…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- United States, Appellant/cross-Appellee v. John C. Grimberg Co., Inc. And W.M. Schlosser Co., Inc., Appellees/cross-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
- Keco Industries, Inc. v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1970
- Burroughs Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1980
- Heyer Products Company v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1956
- Baird Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1983
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Honeywell, Inc. v. The United States v. Haz-Tad, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1989
- Cincom Systems, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1997
- Blount, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1990
- E.W. Bliss Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1995
- Best Foam Fabricators, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1997
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.