Legal Opinion
Finkenstein v. Administrator, Unemployment Compensation Act
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided January 24, 1984No. 11316PublishedCited by 63 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtArthur H. Healey, J.
The plaintiff, Sandra Finken-stein, left her job as a dental assistant and receptionist on Monday, July 30, 1979, after a dispute with her employer concerning absenteeism and the procedure for reporting absences. Thereafter, the plaintiff applied for unemployment compensation benefits under General Statutes § 31-222 et seq. After an examination by a claims examiner designated by the administrator of the Unemployment Compensation Act (administrator),1 the plaintiff was found to be entitled to unemployment benefits as it was determined that she did not leave her job voluntarily.2 Her employer…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Unemployment Compensation Comm'n of Alaska v. AragonSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Robinson v. Unemployment Security Board of ReviewSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- Burnham v. AdministratorSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
- Mazur v. BlumSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
- Jones v. Civil Service CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1978
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by63 opinions
- City of New Haven v. Freedom of Information CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- Hayes v. SmithSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
- United Parcel Service, Inc. v. AdministratorSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- Carothers v. CapozzielloSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
- Connecticut Light & Power Co. v. Department of Public Utility ControlSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.