United Parcel Service, Inc. v. Administrator
Supreme Court of Connecticut
1Opinion of the CourtPeters, C. J.
The central issue in this case is whether, for the purpose of deciding eligibility for unemployment compensation, the wilfulness of an employee’s final act of misconduct depends upon the seriousness of the final incident viewed in isolation or upon the relationship of that final incident to an ongoing pattern of repeated infractions. The defendant administrator of the Unemployment Compensation Act (defendant) awarded compensation benefits to an employee whom the plaintiff, United Parcel Service, Inc., had, terminated for misconduct. The award was reversed by the employment security appeals…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Robinson v. Unemployment Security Board of ReviewSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- McLean v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
- Burnham v. AdministratorSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
- Finkenstein v. Administrator, Unemployment Compensation ActSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
- DaSilva v. Administrator, Unemployment Compensation ActSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1978
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by91 opinions
- Mattatuck Museum-Mattatuck Historical Society v. AdministratorSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
- Connecticut Light & Power Co. v. Texas-Ohio Power, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
- Acro Technology, Inc. v. Administrator, Unemployment Compensation ActConnecticut Appellate Court · 1991
- Starr v. Commissioner of Environmental ProtectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
- Board of Education v. Connecticut State Employees Retirement CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
86 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.