City of Parma v. Public Utilities Commission
Ohio Supreme Court
1Per curiam
This appeal concerns telephone area code designations. Pursuant to Section 251(e)(1), Title 47, U.S.Code, the Federal Communications Commission (“FCC”) is vested with jurisdiction over the North American Numbering Plan (“NANP”). The commission determined that Ameriteeh serves as the “Local Number or CO Code Administrator” under the NANP for the 216 and 330 area codes (among others), and that Ameritech’s duties as CO Code Administrator include (1) the assignment of NXX codes (the three-digit telephone number prefixes that follow the three-digit area codes2) to telecommunication service…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Ohio Bell Telephone Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1992
- MCI Telecommunications Corp. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1988
- Dayton Power & Light Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1983
- City of Cincinnati v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1949
- City of Columbus v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1979
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- In re Application of Black Fork Wind Energy, L.L.C.Ohio Supreme Court · 2013
- In re Application of Columbus S. Power Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 2011
- In re Application of Columbus S. Power Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 2014
- In re Application of Am. Transm. Sys., Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 2010
- In re Fuel Adjustment Clauses for Columbus S. Power Co. & Ohio Power Co. (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2014
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.