In re Application of Columbus S. Power Co.
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtO’Connor, C.J.
{¶ 1} In the proceedings below, the Public Utilities Commission (“PUCO” or “commission”) allowed the American Electric Power operating companies Columbus Southern Power Company and the Ohio Power Company (collectively, “AEP”) to adjust their economic-development cost-recovery riders. Industrial Energy Users-Ohio (“IEU”) appeals the decision. Finding none of IEU’s arguments to have merit, we affirm.
I. Background
{¶ 2} In recent years, the commission has approved several “reasonable arrangements” between AEP and a southeastern Ohio manufacturing company, Ormet Primary Aluminum Corporation.…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Henderson v. ShinsekiSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- Sizemore v. SmithOhio Supreme Court · 1983
- Utility Service Partners, Inc. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 2009
- In re Application of Columbus S. Power Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 2011
- East Ohio Gas Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1940
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by52 opinions
- Mason City School District Board of Education v. Warren County Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 2014
- Bronx Park S. III Lancaster, L.L.C. v. Fairfield Cty. Bd. of Revision (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2018
- In re Complaint of Pilkington N. Am., Inc. (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2015
- In re Complaint of ReynoldsburgOhio Supreme Court · 2012
- State v. MillerOhio Supreme Court · 2023
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.