Legal Opinion
MCI Telecommunications Corp. v. Public Utilities Commission
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided August 31, 1988No. 87-1087PublishedCited by 55 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWright, J.
MCI has raised four issues in which it alleges that the PUCO’s March 12,1987 order (as clarified by the April 29,1987 order) should be found unlawful and unreasonable:
A. The PUCO violated the Due Process Clauses of the Ohio and United States Constitutions and the statutes of Ohio by issuing the March 12, 1987 order without holding an evidentiary hearing.
B. The decisions made and actions taken by the PUCO were not adequately based upon findings, of fact since the PUCO did not have a sufficient record to draw from.
C. The actions taken by the PUCO were not within its statutorily enacted…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Dayton Power & Light Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1983
- Armco, Inc. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1982
- City of Columbus v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1979
- Consumers' Counsel v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1983
3Cited by55 opinions
- Village of Grafton v. Ohio Edison Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1996
- Grafton v. Ohio Edison Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1996
- Hudson v. Petrosurance, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 2010
- Ohio Bell Telephone Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1992
- Monongahela Power Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 2004
50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.