Legal Opinion

In re Fuel Adjustment Clauses for Columbus S. Power Co. & Ohio Power Co. (Slip Opinion)

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided September 3, 2014No. 2012-1484PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtO’Connor, C.J.

Summary

{¶ 1} In 2009, the Public Utilities Commission approved the first electric security plan (“ESP”) for the American Electric Power operating companies, Columbus Southern Power Company and Ohio Power Company (hereafter referred to jointly as “AEP” or the “companies”). This ESP was in effect from 2009 through 2011.

{¶ 2} As part of the ESP, the commission approved a fuel-adjustment clause (“FAC”), which allowed the companies to recover fuel costs for providing generation service as those costs were incurred, without having to file a new rate case. The FAC operates as a separate charge from…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Physicians Committee for Responsible Medicine v. Board of TrusteesOhio Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Office of Consumers' Counsel v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Utility Service Partners, Inc. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 2009
  4. Constellation NewEnergy, Inc. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 2004
  5. State Ex Rel. Schachter v. Ohio Public Employees Retirement BoardOhio Supreme Court · 2009

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. In re Application of Columbus S. Power Co. (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2016
  2. In re Application of Alamo Solar I, L.L.C.Ohio Supreme Court · 2023
  3. Naiman Family Partners, L.P. v. SaylorOhio Court of Appeals · 2020
  4. State v. JonesOhio Court of Appeals · 2017
  5. Pi in the Sky, L. L.C. v. TestaOhio Supreme Court · 2018

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API