Legal Opinion

Clark v. Prudential Property & Casualty Insurance

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided March 11, 2003No. 28126PublishedCited by 50 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TROUT, Chief Justice.

This is an action to enforce an “uninsured motor vehicle” provision in an automobile insurance policy. The insured appeals a district court decision on cross motions for summary judgment holding the insurance policy did not provide coverage for the accident at issue.

I

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

Appellant, Richard Clark (Mr. Clark), was a passenger in a vehicle driven by his wife, Julia Clark (collectively, the Clarks). As the Clarks proceeded on Highway 95 in Nevada, a truck driven by Ed Rutherford (Rutherford) approached from the opposite direction. As the two…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Farm Credit Bank of Spokane v. StevensonIdaho Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Moss v. Mid-American Fire & Marine InsuranceIdaho Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Brinkman v. Aid Insurance Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Sun Valley Potatoes, Inc. v. Rosholt, Robertson & TuckerIdaho Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Mutual of Enumclaw Insurance v. RobertsIdaho Supreme Court · 1996

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by50 opinions

  1. Cascade Auto Glass, Inc. v. IDAHO FARM BUREAU INSURANCE COMPANYIdaho Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Arreguin v. Farmers Ins. Co. of IdahoIdaho Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Hill v. American Family Mutual InsuranceIdaho Supreme Court · 2011
  4. Armstrong v. Farmers Ins. Co. of IdahoIdaho Supreme Court · 2009
  5. Parks v. Safeco Ins Co of IllinoisIdaho Supreme Court · 2016

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API