Legal Opinion

Friel v. Boise City Housing Authority

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1994No. 21106PublishedCited by 112 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McDEVITT, Chief Justice.

I

BACKGROUND AND PROCEDURE

The facts relevant to the defendant’s motion for summary judgment are not in dispute. On February 13, 1991, Bertha Friel (Friel) filed a complaint in district court claiming that Friel was injured when she slipped on ice and fell in a parking lot owned and maintained by the Boise City Housing Authority (BCHA). Friel’s companion, Mrs. Shirley Lemmons, advised the apartment complex’s resident manager of the accident, and the manager then called an ambulance. Friel’s son-in-law, Charles Yost (Yost), informed a BCHA supervisor that he believed that…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Farm Credit Bank of Spokane v. StevensonIdaho Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Harris v. State, Dept. of HealthIdaho Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Newlan v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Cook v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1974
  5. Farber v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 1981

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by112 opinions

  1. Van v. Portneuf Medical CenterIdaho Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Robison v. Bateman-Hall, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Yoakum v. Hartford Fire InsuranceIdaho Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Smith v. Meridian Joint School District No. 2Idaho Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Hines v. HinesIdaho Supreme Court · 1997

107 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API