Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

United States v. Muirhead

Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces

Decided July 28, 1999No. 98-0658/NAPublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Chief Judge COX

delivered the opinion of the Court.

A general court-martial composed of officer and enlisted members found appellant guilty, contrary to his pleas, of assault with intent to inflict grievous bodily harm, in violation of Article 128, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 USC § 928. The adjudged and approved sentence provided for a bad-conduct discharge, 2 years’ confinement, forfeiture of $854.40 per month for 2 years, and reduction to the lowest enlisted grade. The Court of Criminal Appeals affirmed the findings and all of the, except for a portion of the forfeitures found to be…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. United States v. BarnesUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1979
  2. United States v. MeeksUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1994
  3. United States v. SchakeUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1990
  4. United States v. GoodUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1991
  5. United States v. AdamsCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1996

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. United States v. SwiftCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2000
  2. United States v. LovelyUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 2014
  3. Brosius v. WARDEN, US PENITENT., LEWISBURG, PA.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2000
  4. United States v. MetzNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 2020
  5. United States v. NeimanNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 2016

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API