Legal Opinion

United States v. Good

United States Court of Military Appeals

Decided February 13, 1991No. 64,302; CM 8801024PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

SULLIVAN, Chief Judge:

In the spring of 1988, appellant was tried by a special court-martial composed of officer members at Fort Sill, Oklahoma. Contrary to his pleas, he was found guilty of two specifications of larceny, in violation of Article 121, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 USC § 921. He was sentenced to a bad-conduct discharge, confinement for 30 days, and reduction to the lowest enlisted pay grade. The convening authority approved this sentence. On November 28, 1989, the Court of Military Review affirmed the findings of guilty and the sentence in an unpublished opinion.

Thi…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Berkemer v. McCartySupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Illinois v. PerkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  4. Pennsylvania v. BruderSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  5. United States v. DugaUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1981

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. United States v. SwiftCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2000
  2. United States v. MeeksUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1994
  3. United States v. LonetreeUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1992
  4. United States v. JonesCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2014
  5. United States v. BrisbaneCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2006

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API