Legal Opinion
United States v. Adams
Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces
Decided July 30, 1996No. 95-0618; Crim.App. No. 94-0951PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion of the Court
GIERKE, Judge:
A general court-martial composed of officer members at Twentynine Palms, California, convicted appellant, contrary to his pleas, of forgery (31 specifications), wrongfid possession and use of an Armed Forces identification card, and stealing mail matter, in violation of Articles 123 and 134, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 USC §§ 923 and 934, respectively. The approved sentence provides for a dishonorable discharge, confinement for 6 years, total forfeitures, and reduction to the lowest enlisted grade. The Court of Criminal Appeals affirmed in an…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Delaware v. Van ArsdallSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. BinsCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1995
- United States v. BarnesUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1979
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- United States v. PowellCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1998
- United States v. BirdsallCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1998
- United States v. HallCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2002
- United States v. ArmstrongCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2000
- United States v. PabloCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2000
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.