Estate of Lucrecia Pacheco v. Hartford Fire Insurance Co.
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
VÁSQUEZ, Judge.
¶ 1 Defendant/appellant Hartford Fire Insurance Company appeals from the trial court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of plaintiff/appellee Estate of Lucrecia Pacheco. The judgment holds Hartford, as surety on a conservator’s bond, liable for misappropriations by the conservator that occurred prior to the bond’s issuance and awards the Estate prejudgment interest on the amount of the bond. The Estate cross-appeals from the trial court’s denial of its request for attorney fees. For the reasons below, we affirm.
Factual and Procedural Background
¶ 2 We review the facts…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- John C. Lincoln Hospital v. Maricopa CountyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2004
- Odom v. Farmers Ins. Co. of ArizonaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2007
- Southern Surety Co. v. BurneySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
- Mohave Electric Cooperative, Inc. v. ByersCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1997
- Ferrarell v. RobinsonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1970
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Ezell v. QuonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2010
- Hartford Financial Services Group, Inc. v. HandDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2011
- In Re Guardianship of PachecoCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2008
- Hartford Fire Insurance Co. v. Estate of SandersCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2017
- Ezell v. QuonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2010