Legal Opinion

Estate of Lucrecia Pacheco v. Hartford Fire Insurance Co.

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided September 22, 2008No. 2 CA-CV 2007-0135PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

VÁSQUEZ, Judge.

¶ 1 Defendant/appellant Hartford Fire Insurance Company appeals from the trial court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of plaintiff/appellee Estate of Lucrecia Pacheco. The judgment holds Hartford, as surety on a conservator’s bond, liable for misappropriations by the conservator that occurred prior to the bond’s issuance and awards the Estate prejudgment interest on the amount of the bond. The Estate cross-appeals from the trial court’s denial of its request for attorney fees. For the reasons below, we affirm.

Factual and Procedural Background

¶ 2 We review the facts…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. John C. Lincoln Hospital v. Maricopa CountyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2004
  2. Odom v. Farmers Ins. Co. of ArizonaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2007
  3. Southern Surety Co. v. BurneySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  4. Mohave Electric Cooperative, Inc. v. ByersCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1997
  5. Ferrarell v. RobinsonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1970

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Ezell v. QuonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2010
  2. Hartford Financial Services Group, Inc. v. HandDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2011
  3. In Re Guardianship of PachecoCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2008
  4. Hartford Fire Insurance Co. v. Estate of SandersCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2017
  5. Ezell v. QuonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API