State Ex Rel. Department of Economic Security v. Waldren
Arizona Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BERCH, Vice Chief Justice.
¶ 1 We have been asked to decide whether a statutorily non-modifiable spousal maintenance provision in a decree of dissolution of marriage is subject to termination under Arizona Rule of Civil Procedure 60(c)(5). We hold that it is not.
I. FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
¶ 2 In 1986, George Waldren (“Husband”) and Jana Larson (“Wife”) married. Thirteen years and three children later, Wife petitioned to dissolve the marriage. In February 2002, the superior court ended the marriage by entering a twelve-page decree, which included the parties’ settlement agreement.…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Andrews v. BlakeArizona Supreme Court · 2003
- Mail Boxes v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1995
- State v. BirminghamArizona Supreme Court · 1964
- State v. BirminghamArizona Supreme Court · 1964
- North Valley Emergency, Specialists, L.L.C. v. SantanaArizona Supreme Court · 2004
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- County of La Paz v. Yakima Compost Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2010
- Duckstein v. WolfCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2012
- Albano v. SHEA HOMES LTD. PARTNERSHIPArizona Supreme Court · 2011
- Duff v. LeeCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2019
- Nicaise v. SundaramCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2018
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.