Legal Opinion

In Re the Marriage of Williams

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided December 31, 2008No. 2 CA-CV 2008-0109PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ECKERSTROM, Presiding Judge.

¶ 1 Appellant Clarence Williams appeals from the trial court’s denial of his request for attorney fees and costs (hereinafter “attorney fees”). The fees were incurred in a marital dissolution action with his wife, Jeanette Williams. Clarence claims the trial court abused its discretion when it denied his request for an award of attorney fees because Jeanette made unreasonable legal arguments below and the court incorrectly considered her lack of representation in denying his fee request. He also claims the trial court erred in not considering his financial…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. State v. MorrisArizona Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Grant v. Arizona Public Service Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1982
  3. First American Title Insurance v. Action Acquisitions, LLCArizona Supreme Court · 2008
  4. Moore v. MeyersArizona Supreme Court · 1927
  5. Mejak v. GranvilleArizona Supreme Court · 2006

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Boyle v. BoyleCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2012
  2. Jeff D. v. Department of Child SafetyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2016
  3. In Re the Marriage of AllenCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2016
  4. Paul E. v. Courtney F.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2018
  5. Flynn v. CampbellCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2016

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API