Legal Opinion
Miller v. Clinton
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided November 4, 2010No. Civil Action 10-0512 (ESH)PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
ELLEN SEGAL HUVELLE, District Judge.
Plaintiff John R. Miller is a United States citizen who was employed by the Department of State as a safety inspector at the United States Embassy in Paris, France, when he was terminated by defendant Secretary of State Hillary R. Clinton solely on the basis that he had turned 65 years of age. Plaintiff claims that this violates the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (“ADEA”), 29 U.S.C. § 633a. Defendant has moved to dismiss for failure to state a claim on grounds that the ADEA is not applicable and for lack of subject matter…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- National Petroleum Refiners Ass'n v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1973
- United States v. General Motors Corporation, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1975
- United States v. BowenSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
- Stewart v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1982
- Laurel Baye Healthcare of Lake Lanier, Inc. v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2009
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- John Miller, Jr. v. Hillary ClintonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2012
- Miller v. ClintonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- (PC) Jongpil Park v. KittDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2021
- Bird v. Globus Medical, Inc.District Court, E.D. California · 2020
- Bowman v. Adams & Associates, Inc.District Court, E.D. California · 2022
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.