Legal Opinion
Abbey v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided December 1, 2015No. 07-272CPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
On Remand; Cross-Motions for Summary Judgment; RCFC 56; FLSA; 29 U.S.C. §§ 201-219; Federal Employees Flexible & Compressed Work Schedules; 5 U.S.C. §§ 6120-6133.
OPINION AND ORDER
CAMPBELL-SMITH, Chief Judge
The court considers this case on remand. Current and former air-traffie-eontrol specialists or traffic-management coordinators (collectively, controllers), who are or were flexible work schedule (FWS) employees of the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), seek overtime pay under the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938, as amended, 29 U.S.C. §§ 201-219 (FLSA), for hours worked in excess of…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Christianson v. Colt Industries Operating Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Anderson v. Mt. Clemens Pottery Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Akpeneye v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2019
- Coyner v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2022