Legal Opinion

Proudfoot v. State Farm Mutual Insurance

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 23, 2003No. Docket 123502PublishedCited by 55 opinions

1Per curiam

Plaintiff sought no-fault benefits for injuries suffered in a car-pedestrian accident in order to make modifications to her house. The circuit court granted judgment for plaintiff and ordered that certain sums be paid to plaintiff and to the court. The Court of Appeals affirmed in part and reversed in part. We reverse in part the Court of Appeals decision and remand the case to the Washtenaw Circuit Court for further proceedings consistent with this opinion. In all other respects, we affirm.

I

Plaintiff sustained serious injuries in November 1995, when she was struck by a car during a visit to…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Turner v. Auto Club Ins. Ass'nMichigan Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Nasser v. Auto Club Ins. Ass'nMichigan Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Cruz v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Putkamer v. Transamerica Insurance Corp. of AmericaMichigan Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Manley v. Detroit Automobile Inter-Insurance ExchangeMichigan Supreme Court · 1986

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by55 opinions

  1. Douglas v. Allstate Insurance CompanyMichigan Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Bronson Methodist Hospital v. Auto-Owners InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 2012
  3. Armisted v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2012
  4. Allard v. State Farm InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 2006
  5. Moore v. Secura InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 2008

50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API