Legal Opinion

Moore v. Secura Insurance

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 30, 2008No. Docket 135028PublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCorrigan, J.

In this case, we consider the assessment of attorney fees for “overdue” benefits under Michigan’s no-fault insurance statutes. MCL 500.3101 et seq.1 Under these statutes, personal protection insurance *511benefits become “overdue” when an insurer fails to pay “within 30 days after an insurer receives reasonable proof of the fact and of the amount of loss sustained.” MCL 500.3142(2). “An attorney is entitled to a reasonable fee for advising and representing a claimant in an action for personal. . . protection insurance benefits which are overdue.” MCL 500.3148(1). Moreover, “the attorney’s fee…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Smith v. KhouriMichigan Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Saffian v. SimmonsMichigan Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Kitchen v. KitchenMichigan Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Nastal v. Henderson & Associates Investigations, IncMichigan Supreme Court · 2005
  5. Liddell v. Detroit Automobile Inter-Insurance ExchangeMichigan Court of Appeals · 1981

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. Pirgu v. United Services Automobile AssociationMichigan Supreme Court · 2016
  2. Ronnisch Construction Group, Inc v. Lofts on the Nine, LLCMichigan Supreme Court · 2016
  3. Bronson Methodist Hospital v. Auto-Owners InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 2012
  4. Brown v. Home-Owners InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 2012
  5. Adanalic v. Harco National Insurance CompanyMichigan Court of Appeals · 2015

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API