Legal Opinion

Nasser v. Auto Club Ins. Ass'n

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 26, 1990No. 84510, (Calendar No. 13)PublishedCited by 111 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBoyle, J.

We granted leave to appeal in this first-party action to recover no-fault benefits to determine whether the trial court properly granted plaintiff’s motion for summary disposition on the basis that the reasonableness and necessity of medical expenses incurred by plaintiff did not affect defendant’s liability for those expenses under § 3107 of the no-fault act, MCL 500.3101 et seq.; MSA 24.13101 et seq. We also consider whether the trial court properly concluded that the collateral source rule applied in this case to preclude any evidence of other insurance benefits that plaintiff may have…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Tebo v. HavlikMichigan Supreme Court · 1984
  2. DiFranco v. PickardMichigan Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Manley v. Detroit Automobile Inter-Insurance ExchangeMichigan Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Gallaway v. Chrysler Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1981
  5. Butler v. Detroit Automobile Inter-Insurance ExchangeMichigan Court of Appeals · 1982

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by111 opinions

  1. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Michigan Catastrophic Claims Ass'nMichigan Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Advocacy Organization for Patients & Providers v. Auto Club InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 2003
  3. Kevin Krohn v. Home-Owners Ins CoMichigan Supreme Court · 2011
  4. Prince v. Bear River Mutual Insurance Co.Utah Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Hofmann v. Auto Club InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1995

106 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API