Cruz v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
*590Taylor, J.
We granted leave to appeal to consider whether the inclusion of an examination under oath (euo) provision in an automobile no-fault insurance policy is permitted under the Michigan no-fault insurance act. MCL 500.3101 et seq. We hold that EUO provisions may be included in no-fault policies, but are only enforceable to the extent that they do not conflict with the statutory requirements of the no-fault act. Because the insurer in this matter, State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, impermissibly sought to enforce the euo as a condition precedent to its duty to pay no-fault…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Shavers v. Attorney GeneralMichigan Supreme Court · 1978
- Claflin v. Commonwealth InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Cardinal Mooney High School v. Michigan High School Athletic Ass'nMichigan Supreme Court · 1991
- Tebo v. HavlikMichigan Supreme Court · 1984
- State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. Old Republic InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 2002
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by106 opinions
- Rory v. Continental InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 2005
- Griffith v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 2005
- City of Grosse Pointe Park v. Michigan Municipal Liability & Property PoolMichigan Supreme Court · 2005
- Coates v. Bastian Brothers, IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 2007
- Cameron v. Auto Club Ins. Ass'nMichigan Supreme Court · 2006
101 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.