Legal Opinion

Douglas v. Allstate Insurance Company

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 30, 2012No. Docket 143503PublishedCited by 56 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*247YOUNG, C.J.

Under the terms of the no-fault act,1 a person injured in a motor vehicle accident is entitled to recover personal protection insurance (PIP) benefits for “[allowable expenses consisting of all reasonable charges incurred for reasonably necessary products, services and accommodations for an injured person’s care, recovery, or rehabilitation.”2 This case requires this Court to consider whether the services provided by plaintiffs wife constituted services “for an injured person’s care,” whether the Court of Appeals properly remanded this case to the circuit court for findings of fact…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Bailey v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  2. Sun Valley Foods Co. v. WardMichigan Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Roberts v. Mecosta County General HospitalMichigan Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Koontz v. Ameritech Services, IncMichigan Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Johnson v. ReccaMichigan Supreme Court · 2012

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by56 opinions

  1. Clark v Al-AminMichigan Court of Appeals · 2015
  2. Rambin v. Allstate Insurance CompanyMichigan Supreme Court · 2014
  3. Meemic Insurance Company v. Louise M FortsonMichigan Court of Appeals · 2018
  4. ZCD Transportation, Inc. v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 2012
  5. Admire v. Auto-Owners Insurance CompanyMichigan Supreme Court · 2013

51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API