Allard v. State Farm Insurance
Michigan Court of Appeals
1Per curiam
In these consolidated appeals, defendant State Farm Insurance Company appeals as of right the trial court’s order denying its motion for case evaluation sanctions under MCR 2.403 in Docket No. 257702. *396In Docket No. 260435, plaintiff Michael Allard appeals by leave granted1 the trial court’s denial of his motion for a new trial or judgment notwithstanding the verdict (JNOV) under MCR 2.611(A)(1)(e), arguing that the jury’s verdict was inconsistent and against the great weight of the evidence. We affirm the trial court’s order denying Allard’s motion for a new trial or JNOV However, we reverse…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Nasser v. Auto Club Ins. Ass'nMichigan Supreme Court · 1990
- Haliw v. City of Sterling HeightsMichigan Supreme Court · 2005
- CAM Construction v. Lake Edgewood Condominium Ass'nMichigan Supreme Court · 2002
- Kelly v. Builders Square, IncMichigan Supreme Court · 2001
- Proudfoot v. State Farm Mutual InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 2003
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by44 opinions
- Smith v. KhouriMichigan Supreme Court · 2008
- Guerrero v. SmithMichigan Court of Appeals · 2008
- Drew v. Cass CountyMichigan Court of Appeals · 2013
- Tevis v. AMEX ASSURANCE CO.Michigan Court of Appeals · 2009
- Taylor v. MobleyMichigan Court of Appeals · 2008
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.