Legal Opinion
Canady v. Erbe Elektromedizin GmbH
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided September 10, 1998No. Civil Action No. 96-CV-2012 (RMU). Document Nos. 47, 48, 51, 52, 56, 60, 66, 68 and 76PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OMNIBUS MEMORANDUM OPINION RESOLVING ALL PENDING MOTIONS
URBINA, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
At issue in this action is U.S. Patent No. 5,207,675 (“the ’675 patent”). The ’675 patent relates to surgical devices in the field of electrosurgery. Plaintiffs and counter-defendants Jerome Canady and Argon Electro-Surgical Corporation (collectively “Canady”) own the ’675 patent. Defendants and counter-plaintiffs ERBE Elektromedizin GmbH and ERBE U.S.A (collectively “ERBE”) manufacture and sell APC Probes 20132-070, 071, 072, and 100 (“APC Probes”). The APC Probes also relate to surgical devices in…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- MARKMAN Et Al. v. WESTVIEW INSTRUMENTS, INC., Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Vitronics Corporation v. Conceptronic, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Canady v. Erbe Elektromedizin GmbHDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2004
- Canady v. Erbe Elektromedizin GmbHDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2002
- Canady v. Erbe Elektromedizin GmbHDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2005
- Canady v. Erbe Elektromedizin GmbHDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2000