Legal Opinion
Canady v. Erbe Elektromedizin GmbH
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided July 31, 2002No. CIV.A. 96-2012(RMU)PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
URBINA, District Judge.
Denying the Plaintiffs’ Motion to Lift the Stay
I. INTRODUCTION
This matter is before the court on the plaintiffs’ motion to lift the stay imposed by this court on July 28, 2000 pending the outcome of reexamination proceedings before the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (“PTO”). U.S. Patent Number 5,207,675 (“the 675 patent”), the patent at issue in this action, describes an electrosurgical 1 device capable of facilitating blood coagulation 2 during surgical procedures. The plaintiffs, Jerome Canady and Argon Elec-tro-Surgical Corporation, own the 675…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Abbott Laboratories v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Landis v. North American Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Flast v. CohenSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Steffel v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Texas v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Murata MacHinery USA, Inc. v. Daifuku Co., Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2016
- Canady v. Erbe Elektromedizin GmbHDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2004
- Canady v. Erbe Elektromedizin GmbHDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2005
- Hawai'i v. TrumpDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 2017
- Tesco Corp. v. Weatherford International, Inc.District Court, S.D. Texas · 2010
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.