Legal Opinion

Canady v. Erbe Elektromedizin GmbH

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided March 31, 2000No. Civ.A. 96-2012(RMU)PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

URBINA, District Judge.

Granting the Plaintiffs’ Motion for Relief from Summary Judgment of Non-Infringement

I. INTRODUCTION

At issue in this action is U.S.Patent No. 5,207,675 (“the 675 patent”). The 675 pat ent relates to an electro-surgical 1 device which facilitates blood coagulation. 2 The plaintiffs, Jerome Canady and Argon Elec-tro-Surgical Corporation (collectively “Ca-nady”) own the 675 patent. The defendants, a German corporation named Erbe Elektromedizin GmbH and a related corporation named Erbe U.S.A. (collectively “Erbe”) manufacture and sell several models of an…

2Cases cited10 opinions

Vitronics Corporation v. Conceptronic, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
Pennwalt Corporation, Appellant/cross-Appellee v. Durand-Wayland, Inc., Appellee/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
E.I. Du Pont De Nemours & Company v. Phillips Petroleum Company, Phillips 66 Company, and Phillips Driscopipe, Inc., Defendants-Cross-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
United Mine Workers of America 1974 Pension v. Pittston Company, United Mine Workers of America 1974 Pension Trust v. Rawl Sales & Processing Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1993
Arthur L. Serrano and Andrew W. Holman v. Telular CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1997

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

Canady v. Erbe Elektromedizin GmbHDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2004
Kittner v. GatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
Canady v. Erbe Elektromedizin GmbHDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2002
Almerfedi v. ObamaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
Kasper Smoke Kastle LLC v. Atlantic Casualty Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2020

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.