Blaylock v. Shearson Lehman Bros., Inc.
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
Ray Thornton, Justice.
This case presents the question whether a voluntary dismissal, or nonsuit, by a plaintiff is automatically effective as soon as it is filed, or whether a court order or docket entry is required to dismiss the action without prejudice and start the clock ticking on the statutory savings period. The trial court found that a nonsuit becomes effective upon filing, without any action by the trial court; the court further found that, as a consequence, the August 17, 1995 complaint filed by appellants Robert Blaylock, Michael Ibsen, and Steve Perry was time barred. We disagree…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- American Pipe & Construction Co. v. UtahSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Standridge v. StandridgeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1989
- Nash v. JewellSupreme Court of Virginia · 1984
- Whetstone v. ChadduckSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1994
- Wright v. EddingerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1995
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Tigg v. Pirelli Tire Corp.Tennessee Supreme Court · 2007
- Staub v. Eastman Kodak Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1999
- Philip Morris USA, Inc. v. ChristensenCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2006
- Shackelford v. Arkansas Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1998
- Norman v. NormanSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2000
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.