Legal Opinion

Blaylock v. Shearson Lehman Bros., Inc.

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided November 20, 1997No. 96-1176PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Ray Thornton, Justice.

This case presents the question whether a voluntary dismissal, or nonsuit, by a plaintiff is automatically effective as soon as it is filed, or whether a court order or docket entry is required to dismiss the action without prejudice and start the clock ticking on the statutory savings period. The trial court found that a nonsuit becomes effective upon filing, without any action by the trial court; the court further found that, as a consequence, the August 17, 1995 complaint filed by appellants Robert Blaylock, Michael Ibsen, and Steve Perry was time barred. We disagree…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. American Pipe & Construction Co. v. UtahSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Standridge v. StandridgeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1989
  3. Nash v. JewellSupreme Court of Virginia · 1984
  4. Whetstone v. ChadduckSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1994
  5. Wright v. EddingerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1995

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Tigg v. Pirelli Tire Corp.Tennessee Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Staub v. Eastman Kodak Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1999
  3. Philip Morris USA, Inc. v. ChristensenCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2006
  4. Shackelford v. Arkansas Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1998
  5. Norman v. NormanSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2000

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API